|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: DTD: Extra Complexity?
Dan Holle wrote: > Many applications I've seen, and a few that I have > created, don't validate the XML against a DTD. > Is the DTD an extra step, inherited from SGML, > that doesn't really fit XML? XML defines the basic syntax (elements, attributes, entities) A DTD defines how the syntax is structured, i.e., the relationships among the elements and attributes. First, a DTD is optional. This will depend upon your context. If an XML stream has one and only one set of structural rules which define the document, then a single DTD is appropriate. Second, when you have many users of the XML stream, each with different needs, a single DTD dosn't work. You need many. This is what architectural forms allows to happen. It super-imposes the structure of one or more DTD's upon an XML stream. In this case, the DTD declaration is omitted, and another syntax is used to bind the DTD to the document. Third, if it is hard to define "when" the stream begins or ends (i.e. it's not a file), or if the DTD is implicitly understood at both the source and the destination of the message, then it is perfectly acceptable to omit the DTD. Does help? :) Clark xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








