[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: A weaker XSL?

• From: peter@w... (Peter Seibel)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 08:15:35 -0800

At 05:17 AM 2/4/99 , Michael.Kay@i... wrote:
>> Is there a possibility for creating a sub-set of 
>> XSL that would work on a stream instead of 
>> requiring a complete document object?
>
>Funny you should ask that, I've been experimenting over the last few days to
>see whether I could build such a thing on top of SAXON. Not actually easy to
>do as a pure subset, but I think one can do something that feels quite
>XSL-like.

So I obviously lack imagination or understanding of all the intricacies of
XSL -- what can you express in XSL that you couldn't implement on top of SAX?

-Peter

-- 
Peter Seibel          Perl/Java/English Hacker      peter@w...

                     Is Windows98 Y2K compliant? 



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: A weaker XSL?
    • From: Michael.Kay@i...

• Prev by Date: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes"
• Next by Date: Re: Component Markup Language
• Previous by thread: RE: A weaker XSL?
• Next by thread: Re: A weaker XSL?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread