[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal

• From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• To: "James Clark" <jjc@j...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 08:25:07 -0500

From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

>The ModHandler class seems particularily useless.  It just creates a
>completely unnecessary dependency between handler classes and the SAX
>package.  You could use Object just as well.


Rather strongly stated, but this was my initial reaction as well. And I have not
been able to think of a counter argument.

Bill


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Blockland (was Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999)
• Next by Date: Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
• Previous by thread: Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal
• Next by thread: Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread