[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Extra Complexity?

• From: Jeff Greif <jmg@t...>
• To: "Samuel R. Blackburn" <sblackbu@e...>
• Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 08:33:42 -0800

This seems a bit too thorough a rejection of DTD's for content validation.  It is helpful in
writing the application validation code for the prime number to be able to expect to have a
certain kind of element or attribute in a particular place that is the thing to be checked for
primality, and to know that a large subset of the other prerequisites needed for this kind of
check must have already been satisfied.  I find the parser's validation against a DTD valuable
in my application's code which is doing just this sort of thing.  It saves lots of checking
for various errors that cannot happen if the document is known to be valid according to the
DTD.

Jeff

"Samuel R. Blackburn" wrote:

> It depends on how you use XML. If you use it to transfer
> data between applications then DTD's are completely useless.
> Their assumption that the world is flat is inappropriate for
> data applications. Also, the validations performed using DTD's
> don't buy you anything. The application must perform its own
> validation based upon some business rules. DTD's allow you
> to "validate" that a field contains a number but you can't use
> DTD's to "validate" that a field contains a prime number (that
> is an application layer validation).
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Extra Complexity?
    • From: "Samuel R. Blackburn" <sblackbu@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: "Clean Specs"
• Next by Date: Re: "Clean Specs"
• Previous by thread: Re: Extra Complexity?
• Next by thread: Re: Extra Complexity?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread