|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. ))
>Event-based programming existed before people started encapsulating >events in structures or objects. I'd define SAX as an event-based API >that reports events using callbacks. But why are we not taking advantage of having the events as objects? I've tried to second guess why this is so, but I think the arguments in favor of object-based events is stronger: the added overhead is balanced by greater simplicity and subsequently less overhead in other areas; the added flexability adding additional utility to all conformant code. Take for example the DOMParser. It subclasses InputSource to play some tricks. And because InputSource is an object, this lets us use DOMParser with filters that never ever considered having InputSource be anything other than what was provided with SAX. The same will be true of SAX2, if events are objects. It will dramatically increase the utility of all the conformant code! Bill xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








