[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...))

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:16:42 -0500 (EST)

Michael.Kay@i... writes:

 > > > My first cut at it says that all VCs except the following can be
 > > > checked given the full left context (in stream terms, all that
 > > > has come before):
 > 
 > Which reminds me that SAX still needs some kind of statement about when
 > errors are detected and reported. If we ask a ModSAX parser to do
 > validation, do we get a guarantee that a duplicate ID attribute will be
 > reported when the first duplicate value is encountered, or is the parser
 > allowed to wait until end of document?

I don't think that I'd want to constrain implementations that tightly
-- what does everyone else think?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...))
    • From: Michael.Kay@i...

• Prev by Date: Announce: DTDGenerator frontend.
• Next by Date: Re: SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?)
• Previous by thread: RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...))
• Next by thread: Well-formed vs. valid
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread