[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd)

• From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• To: "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 16:29:43 +0000 (GMT)

This and previous forwarded from an (accidentally!) off-list discussion.

To recap, the proposal is that SAX feature identifiers are typed as URI
(ie. superset of URLs and URNs) to give a globally managed namespace,
without associating additional semantics with those names. 

Dan

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 09:50:22 -0500 (EST)
From: David Megginson <david@m...>
To: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@B...>
Subject: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal)

Dan Brickley writes:

 > Here's a small proposal:
 >  
 > >     public abstract void setFeature (String featureID, boolean state)
 > 
 > becomes public abstract void setFeature (URI featureID, boolean state)
 > 
 > (or leave as String but with understanding that the datatype of
 > featureID is anything that's a legal Web URI)

Yes, using URIs was my original idea, and I'm still very partial to
it; I've been using the Java-package-style names in my examples, but
I'd like to know what everyone thinks about the issue.

I'd prefer not the use the java.net.URL class, though -- I don't think 
it buys us anything, since the URIs are not mean to be dereferenced.

 > Justification:
 > 	setFeature needs to be passed an identifying string that
 > 	uniquely picks out some property. Rather than go with the
 > 	pseudo-uri's in Java, it would be more in the spirit of XML
 > 	and Web to use URIs. Using URIs is also more friendly towards
 > 	non-Java implementations of the SAX API.

I'm strongly inclined to agree.  Does anyone have a strong case
against?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd)
    • From: Robb Shecter <shecter@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal)
• Next by Date: Re: Exceptions or not
• Previous by thread: Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal (fwd)
• Next by thread: Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread