[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah.

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: XML List <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 13:57:20 -0500 (EST)

Clark Evans writes:

 > Neet-O.  I heard this quote
 > 
 > > SAX is just a way to populate DOM, it's at lower level.
 > 
 > a while back and it gave me convulsions.  Glad to hear the 
 > real-world experience.   *smile*

Or, to turn it on its head, DOM is just a way to cache SAX events in
memory.  Both statements are, of course, equally silly.

As part of my SAX documentation from a year ago, I wrote a short piece 
on this topic:

  http://www.megginson.com/SAX/event.html


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?)
    • From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>

• Prev by Date: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...
• Previous by thread: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by thread: Re: trying to understand the roll of XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread