[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 15:42:14 -0500

Dan Brickley wrote:

> I disagree. The string 'util.tools.png' is as meaningless in the Java
> community as in the wider world. The Java package naming convention has
> the look but not the substance of a hieararchically managed namespace.
> 'util.tools.png' does not uniquely name anything except within the
> context of a group of consenting adults who've agreed a set of
> conventions for doing so.

Well, that name is in the "private use" part of the Java package
namespace.  But "org.ccil.cowan.sax.DOMParser" *is* hierarchically
managed:  "org.ccil" is a reversed domain name, by the rules of
clause 7.7 of the JLS[1]; the "cowan" part is assigned to me by
the ccil.org Java package agreement; and the rest is up to me.

>From which we learn that every domain ought to have a Java package
assignment convention.

[1] http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/html/7.doc.html#40169

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd)
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd)
• Next by Date: Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd)
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd)
• Next by thread: Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread