[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / X

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 09:32:44 -0600

James Tauber wrote:
> 
> One (serious) issue that imediately arises out of my XML überdocument system
> is that there is a difference in XML between the document entity and other
> entities: the existence of the prolog.

This is a serious problem inherited from SGML. It is my opinion that
instead of namespace declarations being done through attributes they
should have been just another form of PI-based declaration. Then in
version 2.0 of XML, all declarations should have been made "localizable."
In particular, there should be a way to declare internal text entities,
unparsed entities and attribute defaults locally.
-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

"Remember, Ginger Rogers did everything that Fred Astaire did,
but she did it backwards and in high heels."
                                               --Faith Whittlesey

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?)
    • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>

• Prev by Date: "Clean Specs"
• Next by Date: Re: Extra Complexity?
• Previous by thread: Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?)
• Next by thread: Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread