[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: FW: XML Mail

• From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 14:54:23 -0500

John Cowan wrote:
>
>
> Robert Hanson wrote:
>
> > Am I wrong in saying that the answer would be that the symbol
> ">" should not
> > show up in the non-XML text anyway?  Wouldn't it be converted
> to an entity
> > reference?  Like this...
> >
> > "]]>" in the text body would become "]]>"

	This is of course how the text "]]>" would be escaped in a text block. The
issue of dealing with "]]>" arises when we are in a CDATA block. In this
case "]]>" remains CDATA, so John's suggestion about creating two CDATA
sections is a good one.

>
> The point was that conversions like ">" becomes ">" aren't
> necessary if you use CDATA sections, only the one bad case of
> "]]>" which is illegal in plain XML character data as well as
> terminating the CDATA section, and so must become something like
> "]]]]><![CDATA[<", which is "]]" followed by "]]>" to end the
> CDATA section plus "<![CDATA[" to start another CDATA section
> plus ">".  There are other ways to do it, of course.
>
> --

	What I have done in XMTP is to CDATA all text based non-xml bodies (i.e.
mime:BODY) but escape the text nodes of mime headers. e.g. Message-ID:
<sample@somewhere> becomes:

<Message-ID >&lt;sample@somewhere&gt;</Message-ID >

as opposed to:

<Message-ID ><[CDATA[<sample@somewhere>]]></Message-ID >

just because, at the moment, this results in an average slightly larger
document (granted just a few bytes) and also because of vague stylistic
leanings. The best reason to <[CDATA[ the bodies is that it makes looking at
enclosed HTML ever so much easier.

Is there a good reason to prefer one over the other for headers?

Jonathan Borden
http://jabr.ne.mediaone.net


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: FW: XML Mail
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Req uirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999)
• Next by Date: Re: Confusion about conditional sections
• Previous by thread: Re: FW: XML Mail
• Next by thread: Re: FW: XML Mail
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread