[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX: Next Round

• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 10:18:27 +0700

John Cowan wrote:

> Parser filters are
> just parsers that have a "parser(Parser)" constructor.

This makes a lot of sense to me.

With the setParent(Parser parser) idea, what's a filter supposed to do
if the app fails to call setParent()? A filter has to have a parent
Parser.  Your suggestion captures this nicely.

James



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • SAX: Next Round
    • From: <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX: Next Round
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX: Next Round (Namespace support)
• Next by Date: Re: SAX: Next Round (Lexical Event Handler)
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX: Next Round
• Next by thread: RE: Next Round
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread