[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 15:42:01 -0600

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> Paul Prescod wrote:
> 
> > XML is not optimized for update, retrieval, searching or anything else. It
> > is optimized for interchange, interchange and interchange.
> 
> Also for durability and durability (but perhaps not durability).

Good point. Interchange across the time dimension is very important.
People who use a relational or object database for their day-to-day work
should definitely consider backing up a periodic XML dump, just as people
who use XML day-to-day should consider how those other tools can help to
make it updatable, retrievable, searchable, etc.

 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

"In spite of everything I still believe that people are basically 
good at heart." - Anne Frank

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>

• References:
  • RE: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
    • From: "Paul Butkiewicz" <arabbit@e...>
  • Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Reserved names and documentation
• Next by Date: RE: Reserved names and documentation
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Next by thread: Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread