[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML - NG

• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: "ML XMLDev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:21:35

At 16:06 13/01/99 +0800, [...] wrote:
>>Is there any group working or thinking about an XML 2.0 spec? Is XMLDev an
>>appropriate place to talk about such a thing?

It's marginal. In favour is that XML-DEV is a good breeding ground for
ideas. Against is that this is formally a W3C activity and that it's easy
to spend a lot of discussion getting nowhere. In the past I have tended to
discourage such discussions, but I have deliberately let things run a bit
more freely over the last 2 months or so.

	P.

Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XML - NG
    • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: HTML Form to XML module
• Next by Date: FW: XSchema suggestion/wish: Parameter entity (or SGML DTD inclusions/exclusions?) "equivalent"
• Previous by thread: Re: XML - NG
• Next by thread: Re: XML - NG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread