Re: OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
At 10:00 AM 1/21/99 +0100, Matthew Sergeant (EML) wrote: > It's interesting I was thinking about the very same thing just the >other day. Currently our standards as defined by the W3C (and other >standards bodies) are defined by effectively locking a group of "members" in >a room and waiting until they emerge with something worthwhile. [...] > > Is this neccessarily a bad thing? I don't know - we've never really >experienced anything different. And yet when I compare it to the software >world, and read "The Cathedral and The Bazaar", I can't help wondering if >developing standards in a Bazaar might be a better model. It would certainly >be interesting to try. XML-Dev has had two such open efforts I'd call successful - SAX and XSchema. While XSchema (now submitted to the W3C as DDML) hasn't recieved the broad implementation SAX has - it's a much more crowded field, the standard-building process definitely had an effect on the way the XML world, including the W3C, looks at schemas. For more on DDML and the process used to build it, see http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ddml. (Yes, I'll be updating the page to reflect acceptance of XSchema as the DDML note shortly.) Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (March) Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format