[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?

• From: <david@m...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 10:36:59 -0500 (EST)

Dan Holle writes:

 > IMHO, Occam's Razor between XML and DBMS revolves around data
 > complexity and multiple updaters.
 > 
 > If the XML phonebook had every US phone number, you wouldn't want
 > to be on the receiving end of a servlet like this.

 [etc.]

Actually, XML would be a wonderful way to transfer every U.S. phone
number from one database to another, but querying an XML document (or
a representation of it in a repository) would not be an efficient way
to look up a specific phone number, and transferring the whole
phonebook in XML to a thin client would be plain silly.

In brief, then, XML is a very sophisticated exchange (import/export)
format, and RDBMs are very sophisticated storage and retrieval tools.
Different species, but they can be taught to play together nicely.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• References:
  • Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
    • From: "Dan Holle" <dan@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Next by Date: Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Next by thread: Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread