[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Repositories: From Argument to Architecture

• From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 10:27:50 -0800

Simon, I'm in 100 percent agreement with this!

Repository-in-a-box. Very nice. I see the need too. Esp with tools that
have File menus that only know how to store stuff in the repository. 

What goes back and forth between the writer's desktop and the server is
XML. When it's time to publish a piece it's just enabled for access thru a
public URL and rendered thru the public templates. The writers see very
little XML, the editors see a lot, and the readers see whatever is
appropriate given the path they take to get to the info.

In a nutshell, that's the vision for our next-generation.

I think I'm going to stop writing for this morning. I'm concerned that I'm
promoting too much here and might outstay my welcome.

Dave


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Repositories: From Argument to Architecture
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Repositories: From Argument to Architecture
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is XML for the peons or the gods? (was What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: what is a namespace anyway? [Re: Another errata?]
• Previous by thread: Repositories: From Argument to Architecture
• Next by thread: Re: Repositories: From Argument to Architecture
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread