[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Why informal specs usually win

• From: Michael.Kay@i...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 11:43:06 -0000

> 
> "Since then, almost every author of books on new programming languages
> used [BNF] to specify the syntax rules of the language."
> 
The reality, unfortunately, is that almost every author has invented a new
variant of BNF to specify the relevant syntax rules.

Mike Kay

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why informal specs usually win
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Next Round
• Next by Date: RE: Next Round
• Previous by thread: Java DOM implementations and cloneNode
• Next by thread: Re: Why informal specs usually win
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread