[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX: Next Round (Namespace support)

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 22:35:55 -0500 (EST)

James Clark scripsit:

> However, I wonder whether it's really a good idea to allow apps to
> choose the separator. It makes it harder to chain together SAX processes
> using things like the Filter.  If one DocumentHandler expects names
> separated by # and another expects them separated by !, then they can't
> work together without some additional glue. I think consideration should
> be given to mandating a specific separator character. It's not obvious
> to me what the right answer is here.

The criteria I used were:

1)	must be ASCII
2)	must not be whitespace
3)	must not be valid in a URI
4)	must not be valid in an NCName
5)	must not commonly appear after a URI (#, |) or before an NCName(:).

The result?  Circumflex.

	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/xmlns/foo^bar

means foo:bar when xmlns:foo="http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/xmlns".

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@c...
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX: Next Round (Namespace support)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• References:
  • Re: SAX: Next Round (Namespace support)
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why informal specs usually win
• Next by Date: Understanding RDF
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX: Next Round (Namespace support)
• Next by thread: Re: SAX: Next Round (Namespace support)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread