|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] XML - NG
If we just could supply XML text element with datatype attribute, something like... <DONT dt:type="cdata">&<this tag is not parsed>&</DONT> - equivalent to CDATA within <DONT> element but easier to read. I would even declare it in DTD for some elements. For example for those holding URL. Nikita Ogievetsky >From: David LeBlanc <whisper@a...> >Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 17:09:01 -0800 >Subject: Re: XML - NG >Ok, I see I misspoke myself out of not understanding some things that have >been pointed out about the various meanings of CDATA. I never whould have >realized (well, not anytime soon), that attribute CDATA wasn't the same as >other types of CDATA. Thanks. > >What I would like is a content type (call it UPDATA), that has a distinct >start and stop tag (<UPDATA> ..... </UPDATA>) that is entirely unparsed. >This would be useful for content that has lots of significant characters.. >like xml itself. In fact, I was thinking that it could be <CDATA>.... ></CDATA>, but I now realize that there's a lot of freight attached to that >character combination :-). > >It seems blechy to have to declare content PCDATA and then do the <[CDATA[ >... ]]> thing in the document. It forces the author of a document rather >then the designer of a document class to be responsible for "escaping" >content. > >Dave LeBlanc > >At 07:27 PM 1/13/99 -0400, Steve DeRose wrote: >>At 3:45 AM -0400 2/6/99, David LeBlanc wrote: >>>At a minimum, a couple of things i'd like to see are CDATA element content >>>and CDATA attribute content. >> >>CDATA element content was one of the most-hated features of SGML (mainly >>because of the rules about how they end). But more importantly, adding it >>would remove one of the most important advantages (to my mind) of XML: you >>could no longer correctly parse a document without the DTD -- since you'd >>never know whether that "<" you just found was a delimiter or data. I >>discuss this at length in The SGML FAQ Book, along with the rationale that >>ultimately underlies many of XML's other choices (probably should have put >>"XML" in the title, since most of it talks about XML motivation anyway). >> >>As for CDATA attributes, I thought we had those. Now, "CDATA" for >>attributes doesn't mean "entities aren't recognized" in them -- but it >>doesn't mean that in SGML either. So if that's what you were hoping for, >>there's no way to get it without pitching the nice property that XML is an >>SGML subset -- SGML has no way to suppress delimiter recognition in >>attributes (except perhaps the MS[IOS]CHAR function characters, which I >>have never seen used, and doubt most SGML implementations actually >>implement). >> >>Just my $0.02. >> >>Steve >> >> >>Steven_DeRose@B...; http://www.stg.brown.edu/~sjd >>Chief Scientist, Scholarly Technology Group, and >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Brown University; >>Chief Scientist, Inso Corporation >> >> >> >>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... >>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ >>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; >>(un)subscribe xml-dev >>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; >>subscribe xml-dev-digest >>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...) >> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








