[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML - NG

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 13:43:47 -0500

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> >You can't.  Nor <'s either.  But CDATA in "CDATA attribute" does not
> >mean the same thing as in "CDATA element content", which does not
> >mean the same as in "CDATA section".
> 
> Which suggests that at some point a colossal renaming scheme is in order.

Aaaaak!  One Great Renaming was enough!

But at least in XML the term "CDATA" has only 2 meanings, rather
than the 5 meanings of full SGML....
 
-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XML - NG
    • From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
  • Re: XML - NG
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSL
• Next by Date: RE: A practical question about attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: XML - NG
• Next by thread: Re: XML - NG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread