[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Namespaces doc.

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Adam M Donahue <amd0978@a...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:04:31 -0800

At 04:32 PM 1/29/99 -0500, Adam M Donahue wrote:
>In the XML Namespaces specification, section 5.2:
>
>	If the URI reference in a default namespace declaration is empty,
>	then unprefixed elements in the scope of the declaration are not
>	considered to be in any namespace.
>
>Then, a few lines below:
>
>	The default namespace can be set to the empty string.  This has
>	the same effect, within the scope of the declaration, of there
>	being no default namespace.
>
>Is not the second sentence redundant?  

Looks that way to me.  -T.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Is XML for the peons or the gods? (was What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: Re: Another errata?
• Previous by thread: Namespaces doc.
• Next by thread: Another errata?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread