[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Compound Documents - necessary for success?

• From: keshlam@u...
• To: xml-dev-digest@i...
• Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:15:39 -0500

Just to state the alternative to a "document of documents": a meta-document
structure can address many of the same needs, at some loss of
locality-of-reference. Consider the direction that Xlink is taking, where
in addition to documents being able to specify links to each other --
including links that essentially function as "import" or "include" requests
-- it's possible to write a separate document that builds associations
between two documents that are completely unaware of this higher-level
structure.

Hyperlinking and metadata aren't a 100% overlap with the
document-of-documents concept; there obviously are times when you really do
want all the information to be bundled together (for digital signature of
the composite, perhaps, if it's to be treated as a single legal document).
But this may be another case where the simple solution handles 90% of the
problem for 10% of the effort.

______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are solely those of the author.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Will XML eat the web?
• Next by Date: XML for Java serialization
• Previous by thread: Re: Compound Documents - necessary for success?
• Next by thread: Re: Compound Documents - necessary for success?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread