[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:15:58 -0500

Bill la Forge wrote:

> Open Source Software and vendor controlled standards bodies, IMHO, are a poor marrage.
> The advantage of Java and XML is that they let you do significant work without the need
> for a large team effort.

Say what?

Java is not open source; there is an open-source version (Kaffe),
but it's not yet ready for prime time (feel free to contradict me
if you know otherwise).

Java is a vendor-controlled standard (maybe soon to go away).

XML is a vendor-consortium-controlled standard.

If you don't like these processes, try IETF or ISO.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
    • From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Word and XML (was: XML standards coherency and so forth)
• Next by Date: Re: Next Round
• Previous by thread: OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
• Next by thread: Re: OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread