>Well put, Joel. Notations appear to me to be the best way to declare the >atomic types. I humbly submit that a well designed schema would include a >set of notation declarations for its atomic types and perhaps a few middling >complex types. Agreed. And to encourage reuse of notations, I am going to set up a section on SCHEMA.NET as a repository for notation declarations. John Cowan's are a great start. Any more. Let's actually put together some for some ISO8601 formats. >Attributes can contain notation names for use in describing the >element value. Correct, so why do you want: >I would like to see the following syntax: ><!ELEMENT OrderTime (#PCDATA) NDATA Iso8601_DateTime > when you can just have <!ELEMENT OrderTime (#PCDATA)> <!ATTLIST OrderTime notation NOTATION (Iso8601_DateTime) #FIXED "Iso8601_DateTime"> ? xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format