[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

MIME namespace...

• From: "Gabe Beged-Dov" <begeddov@j...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 17:24:20 -0800

There are at least two schools of thought on the list vis-a-vis type
identification of unparsed thingies (thingies is my placeholder for binary
entities and links). The SGML school points to the rich infrastructure based
on notations while the WWW school points to MIME. I tend to be in the WWW
school.

Anyway, in order to foster more discussion on the MIME front, I would like
to suggest the idea of having a MIME namespace. BTW, I have not investigated
this but am throwing it out in a mostly yeasty state for group baking.

An example usage (with made up URLs) would be:

<PICTURE
        xmlns:mime="http://www.ietf.org/rfc2045"
        mime:content-type="image/jpeg"
        href="ftp://ftp.pictures.com/pretty.jpg">
Its a pretty picture
</PICTURE>

I am assuming that links would be treated similarily to the
"message/external-body" element in MIME. The MIME rfc can be found at:
http://info.internet.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc/files/rfc2045.txt

 If this approach (or something similar) is viable, the question becomes
what needs to happen to make this work?

Gabe Beged-Dov
www.jfinity.com



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: MIME namespace...
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Describing tables in XML
• Next by Date: Re: Notations
• Previous by thread: XML Parse, which resolves enitities
• Next by thread: Re: MIME namespace...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread