[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why XML data typing is hard

• From: <david@m...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 13:24:41 -0500 (EST)

Henry S. Thompson writes:

 > if we add sensitivity to language to our lexical typing, I might write
 > 
 > <balance xml:lang='fr'>4,50</balance>
 > 
 > OR
 > 
 > <balance xml:lang='ar'>&#x0664;&#x066B;&#x0665;&#0660;</balance>
 > 
 > Is the latter an indication of a plausable way forward, i.e. lexical
 > types which are parameterised by (natural) language?

It sounds quite plausible: it still places a burden of locale handling
on the processor or the application, but that's inevitable when we're
dealing with lexical constraints.  At least with this approach the
application will be able to fail gracefully:

  Warning: sample.xml line 18 column 12: Cannot validate constraint
           "float" for unsupported language "ar" (trying default
           locale en-CA).

(That's not "Californian English", by the way.)


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Why XML data typing is hard
    • From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@e...>
  • Re: Why XML data typing is hard
    • From: <david@m...>
  • Re: Why XML data typing is hard
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: XML and embedded compound data types (was "Why XML data typin is hard")
• Next by Date: Re: Why XML data typing is hard
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML data typing is hard
• Next by thread: Re: Why XML data typing is hard
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread