[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XLink - where are we? [tiny amount o

• From: Graham Moore <graham.moore@d...>
• To: xml-dev@i...,eliot@d...
• Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 8:56:07 +0000

Eliot wrote

>The last two [java class for elements / swing classes] are no different 
from requiring a style sheet--someone still has to
> provide
> a per-document or document type definition of what the styling should
> be

The functional binding / class => element could be done as a default. Look 
in the location where the document was acquired from using the element name 
as the class name. It would just work, with no additional configuration 
files. If no class exists then the node is just a node.

cheers,

graham.

gdm@d...






xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XLink - where are we? [tiny amount o
    • From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@d...>
  • Re: XLink - where are we? [tiny amount o
    • From: David Brownell <db@E...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML for Network Topology
• Next by Date: Re: XLink - where are we? [tiny amount of frustration]
• Previous by thread: parsing the attributes
• Next by thread: Re: XLink - where are we? [tiny amount o
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread