|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Topic Maps on SQL
At 10:40 PM 11/21/98 -0600, len bullard wrote: >Steve brings up the point that I do wish would be looked at >seriously by other language communities: the potential of >using property set/grove concepts to create information >standards that are independent of lexical/syntax representation >and implementation. You know, this goes straight to the core of a deep issue. Where I have often felt out of sync with the grove/property-set evangelists is that I perceive syntax as fundamental and any particular data model as ephemeral. I guess I must admit that I don't believe in "information standards that are independent of lexical/syntax representation". The reason is that I know how to interoperate robustly and efficiently based on syntax; but in my 20 years of experience in software I have seen very little successful interoperation based on data structures or APIs; and usually at high cost and irritating fragility. This was what originally drew me to SGML. Also I have trouble believing that any one data model will work well across the infinite breadth of application types and computing infrastructures. Even one as sophisticated as groves. Guess I'm just old-fashioned. -Tim xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








