[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)

• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 17:16:30 +1100

> From:   David Brownell

> A pragmatic answer "why":  it uses the data model implied by
> SAX, which treats characters "quoted" by "<![CDATA[" ... "]]>"
> like any other characters (but without using '&' and '<' as
> markup delimiters).

Aha! I think this is the big difference in approach. The David's are saying
that CDATAsects are tags which switch in and out an effect, while I am
saying that the CDATAsect is markup which delimits a range and labels it.

Personally, I hope CDATAsects are removed from the mooted XML profile (does
it have a code name? EZX?), I have never thought they were a particularly
good idea. But I guess they wont be, in that it would make it possible to
generate EZX documents which were not WF XML documents. [I'd guess EZX would
remove DTDs (no entities!), make UTF-8 the only charset, allow but deprecate
PIs (in particular before and after fragments or root-elements), allow but
deprecate CDATAsects, build-in the ISO public entity sets with HTMLsymbols,
and build-in namespaces. I suppose this would then become the syntax used
for HTML 5, or whatever HTML+XML is called. That would be a nice little
language.]

Rick Jelliffe


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
    • From: David Brownell <db@E...>

• Prev by Date: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Next by Date: RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Previous by thread: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Next by thread: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread