|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why XML data typing is hard
At 05:59 PM 11/30/98 +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote: >Basically I agree that we're not talking datatypes, we're talking >lexical types ... >Is the latter an indication of a plausable way forward, i.e. lexical >types which are parameterised by (natural) language? It's good that we're distinguishing between lexical types and datatypes. With real datatypes, it seems that we ought to be able to hard-wire the syntax - i.e. say that for FIXED or FLOAT data types, the following decimal delimiter is always used, for DATE it's always ISO8601, and so on. The idea being that this kind of thing, in a production type app, is going to be run through software machinery at both ends, such that on the screen, a Francophone will see 4,50 and and Anglophone 4.50, so it doesn't matter that much what's between the tags. It seems to me that this kind of hardwired datatyping is in greater short-term demand and is also easier to implement efficiently than lexical typing, thus that's where I'd start; but reasonable people may disagree. -Tim xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








