[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

XML over HTTP

• From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• To: "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:41:14 +0100

Greetings;

I have a simple question.

What are people doing when they read xml 'over the wire'?. It would appear
that the logical structure of an xml document (to wit
  [1] document ::= prolog element Misc*
) is at odds with the protocol specified for things like a http put operation.
For which a response from the recipient cannot come until after the operation
is performed. As a consequence of which, the input socket remain open (being a
two-way stream in order to write the response) after the object has been read.
In which case EOF is not a useful hint that the document is complete.

The same problem will appliy to connections which are kept alive for extended communications.

We could well assert a specific document structure, - for example prescribing
miscellaneous content after the document element, but i'm wondering what the
general W3 intent was.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML over HTTP
    • From: David Brownell <db@E...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPointer's sleeping ???
• Next by Date: Re: XPointer's sleeping ???
• Previous by thread: SAX drivers bug ... or feature !
• Next by thread: Re: XML over HTTP
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread