Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
John Cowan wrote: > > DOM Level 1 is an ugly mess, and the only justification for it > is to keep Netscape and Microsoft from implementing even uglier > incompatible DOMs. I think everyone recognizes some of the compromises that went into DOM, and has a list of some mistakes they'd fix. But I don't think there's a good consensus on which things are mistakes rather than features ... To put it differently: is there really room for another API to represent XML structure? I tend to think that DOM, warts and all, is "good enough" for most purposes. And for those other purposes, I suspect that no standard API could suit. - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format