[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Why is there no DOM-C++ binding in DOM spec?

• From: Hyoungsoo Yoon <hyoung@f...>
• To: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>,XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 16:38:57 +0200

Hello,

I've been trying to implement DOM api in C++ language.
But I just can't get past the initial design stage.

My question is:
How much freedom do I have in my implementation?
Since no official language binding is provided in the
spec (or is there any?), I suppose I can take some
liberty.

More specifically:
[1] Do I need to adopt OMG IDL C++ language binding
standard? It appears very specific to CORBA, which
I'm not planning to include at this stage.
[2] Or is it mandatory to include some sort of "object
brokerage interface" such as CORBA or DCOM?
[3] How important is this "detail" such as using Attr
instead of Attribute?
[4] More fundamentally, do we really need this
standardization in C++ language? I can see its importance
in script languages or "light-weight" languages such as java,
which can be used, for example, inside a browser. But
I can't think of any good examples for C++ (perhaps outside
the context of CORBA or COM).

Thanks all,
youngsoo

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Welcome, DOM!
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
  • Re: Welcome, DOM!
    • From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>

• Prev by Date: Fw: DOM Level 1 Becomes a W3C Recommendation
• Next by Date: Re: Welcome, DOM!
• Previous by thread: Re: Welcome, DOM!
• Next by thread: Re: SOX again
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread