[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML WG Reorganization questions

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:25:19 -0800

At 11:28 AM 10/29/98 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>1) I don't see where namespaces are listed as any of these groups' work,
>though the activity statement still mentions them as W3C work.

Stay tuned.

>2) Is the Fragment Working Group the descendant of XPointer, or something
>else?  XPointer started out with XLink, but seems to be migrating further
>and further away from its origins.

No, Fragment is new.  XPointer is still in the Linking group. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Is XML 1.0 underspecified? (was: Re: CDATA by any other name...)
• Next by Date: RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Previous by thread: re: XML WG Reorganization questions
• Next by thread: Re: JavaOne and XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread