[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Web server logs in XML?

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 02:26:29 -0700

Michael,

>I have no question that XML will grow to rule the world, but I'm trembling
>at the thought that somebody might take all of the science discussed here a
>bit to literally and force me to get another 5 or 6 10gb drives and make me
>keep my logs in raw xml.


1. Using XML just for describing the structure of the data makes no sense
because you can not use generic XML tools to process the data.

2. Compression reduces file size difference to 10%-30%.

3. Cost of 10 Gig drives will be considerablly less by the time server
vendors stop supporting legacy log formats.

4. Due to the Y2K problem, concerns for compactness is equated with
shortsightedness these days.

Best,

Don Park
Docuverse



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Web server logs in XML?
    • From: Michael Ax <ax@h...>

• Prev by Date: Confusion regarding notation processing
• Next by Date: Re: Web server logs in XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Web server logs in XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Web server logs in XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread