[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Content v. attribute

• From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@w...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 11:34:17 -0500

At 08:02 AM 10/26/98 -0800, Dave Winer wrote:
>[..] When I design XML forms
>for our own internal applications, I have generally found that if I use
>attributes, I end up regretting it and switch over to straight tag
>hierarchy. [...]

So it has been with our document types, and in particular WIDL.  Many
values that were once attributes are now content in child elements.  We
tend to put values in content when the values might evolve over time or
when they are open ended.  We still use attributes though because they are
more concise and we like to keep our documents as human-readable as possible.

Even now we are contemplating moving still more attribute values to child
elements.  We don't want a proliferation of versions of our document types,
so in the future you can bet that we'll be putting values in content far
more often than we'll be putting them in attributes.

Maybe this is a good rule of thumb: attributes for quick hacks, content for
longevity.
--
Joe Lapp, Senior Engineer | jlapp@w...
webMethods, Inc.          | Voice: 703-267-1726
http://www.webMethods.com |   Fax: 703-352-0370

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Content v. attribute
• Next by Date: Re: Content v. attribute
• Previous by thread: Re: Content v. attribute
• Next by thread: Re: Content v. attribute
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread