[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: C++ or IDL definitions for SAX

• From: <david@m...>
• To: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 16:43:20 -0400 (EDT)

Tyler Baker writes:

 > I am not so sure a CORBA IDL definition of SAX would be so useful
 > anyways unless you developed some efficient method of multiplexing
 > the SAX events that get sent over the network.

It seems like a fairly simple thing to manage, because the
dependencies are mostly one-way -- the driver could deliver events in
chunks of 100 (or 1,000, or whatever), blocking only when it needs
user input from an EntityResolver.

 > As far as C++ goes, I don't think a lot of people are doing too
 > much work here because any popular C++ tools for Windows have
 > pretty much no chance anymore of making an impact because of a very
 > well known large company having the reputation of cloning anything
 > and everything of any value written in C++ (looks like Java and a
 > few other lesser known languages are the last bastion of hope for
 > the software industry).

That might be an extreme position.  MS certainly has reduced
techno-diversity in commercial software, but it hasn't been able to do
much damage to free software (which is where most XML parsers live):
for example, Apache and Perl still own their markets.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • C++ or IDL definitions for SAX
    • From: RJA@d...
  • C++ or IDL definitions for SAX
    • From: <david@m...>
  • Re: C++ or IDL definitions for SAX
    • From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: C++ or IDL definitions for SAX
• Next by Date: "delegate" and "GI" (was RE: Do we need link-catalogs for schemas?)
• Previous by thread: Re: C++ or IDL definitions for SAX
• Next by thread: Re: C++ or IDL definitions for SAX
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread