[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 19:13:33 -0400

At 03:54 PM 10/6/98 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>John Cowan wrote:
>> 
>> Well, I can say that Netscape 4.06, IE 4.01, and Lynx 2.7, all on
>> Windows NT 4.0 SP3, are "XHTML-compliant" using the <BR /> trick.
>
>The "3.0 browsers" seem a bit more sensitive; that's where some more
>facts would help most.  I confess to having little sympathy for the
>folk running 2.0 browsers any more.

Netscape and IE 3.0 seemed to work fine with <BR /> in my tests (including
IE 3.01/Mac).  I'll have to dig out an old DevEdge disk for 1.0 and 2.0.  I
may even have an old Mosaic someplace...

Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth (November)
Building XML Applications (December)
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
  • Re: Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Re: Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
    • From: David Brownell <db@E...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
• Next by Date: Re: TLAs (was: SOX)
• Previous by thread: Re: Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
• Next by thread: Re: More namespaces perversion
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread