[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSchema: Sections 5.0 and 5.1

• From: rbourret@d... (Ron Bourret)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:24:21 +0200

Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> But, of course, piggy-backing PIs onto elements using attributes
> is probably always a preferable option, if your PI structure can
> matches the start-tag locations.

Do you mean that instead of using:

<?XSchema SYSTEM="foo.xsc" ?>
<foo>
...
</foo>

we should use something like:

<foo XSchemaSystem="foo.xsc">
...
</foo>

A good idea, but I don't think it will work for us.  We accept an arbitrary 
number of XSchema PI's, so there is no way to name the attributes.

> 
> Even if you use attribute-like syntax, PI values are still just
> text strings, from the XML viewpoint.  Having a target (notation)
> to indicate the syntax of the PI is a great headstart in labelling.

I don't understand what you mean.  A PI has a target by definition, but I don't 
know how this indicates syntax.

-- Ron Bourret

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: xml schema -> DTD
• Next by Date: Re: Processing instructions (was XSchema: Sections 5.0 and 5.1)
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema: Sections 5.0 and 5.1
• Next by thread: XSchema: Section 4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread