[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Shocking News: Namespaces and Non-Validation

• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan@t...>
• To: Mark Tucker <mct@f...>
• Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 10:17:03 -0400

At 08:12 AM 9/9/98 -0500, Mark Tucker wrote:
>
>I was shocked to hear that namespaces invalidate validation.

Well, not quite. As long as you specify the prefix in both the DTD and the
document, you can still validate, since the prefix is basically treated as
part of the element name or attribute name.

>The problem seems to be that DTD validation does not expand 
>prefixes, nor does it apply namespace defaulting.

I think we're hoping for the schema group to fix this for us. The DCD
proposal, for instance, provides namespace support. For now, though, I
think we're stuck with specifying the prefix in both the DTD and the document.

Jonathan
 
jonathan@t...
Texcel Research
http://www.texcel.no

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Shocking News: Namespaces and Non-Validation
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>

• References:
  • Shocking News: Namespaces and Non-Validation
    • From: Mark Tucker <mct@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Shocking News: Namespaces and Non-Validation
• Next by Date: Re: HTML != XML (was Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for xt)
• Previous by thread: Shocking News: Namespaces and Non-Validation
• Next by thread: Re: Shocking News: Namespaces and Non-Validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread