[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML is boring (long --- sorry)

• From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@e...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 10:03:55 +0100

>If Microsoft, for example, were to store all their Office
files in XML then
>you could use any other tool to work on the files.


I regret that this statement is no more true than saying "if
they stored all their data in ASCII then you could use any
other tool...".

Storing data in XML is a useful step towards this goal, but
it is not sufficient. The XML constructs used also need to
be well-documented. Given the choice between a
well-documented XML format and a well-documented non-XML
format, the difference is not whether you can process the
data, but how easy it is.

Anyway, I question the goal. I still believe encapsulation
is a Good Thing. I don't think the world would be a better
place if every application revealed all its internal data
structures (or even just its persistent internal data).

Mike Kay



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: XML's proof
• Next by Date: No Subject
• Previous by thread: Re: XML is boring
• Next by thread: Re: XML is boring (long --- sorry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread