[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML *should* be boring

• From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>,"XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 08:17:06 -0700

>>If we do our job as well as the TCP/IP people did, users should hardly
notice that XML exists -- after all, we're supposed to help them do
their work, not draw attention to our own.

Amen.

Dave

--------------------------------------
http://www.userland.com/directory.html


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XML is boring (was Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XML is boring (was Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • XML *should* be boring
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: DTD vs Schema
• Next by Date: Applying XML
• Previous by thread: XML *should* be boring
• Next by thread: Re: XML *should* be boring
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread