[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: namespaces discussion

• From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:48:37 -0400

Peter Jones wrote:

> [W]hy can't...elements themselves [have] a namespace URI which addresses
> a DTD entity for that particular element?

This is exactly what Tim is alluding to.  If the idea can be formally
defined, and implemented - and incorporated into the namespace spec -
we could distribute not only processing, but also definition, of XML
document types.

-- 

Richard Goerwitz
PGP key fingerprint:    C1 3E F4 23 7C 33 51 8D  3B 88 53 57 56 0D 38 A0
For more info (mail, phone, fax no.):  finger richard@g...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • namespaces discussion
    • From: Peter Jones <peterj@w...>

• Prev by Date: Expanded Name vs Prefix Name + Compound DTD: Whats the difficulty?
• Next by Date: Re: namespaces discussion
• Previous by thread: Re: namespaces discussion
• Next by thread: namespaces discussion
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread