[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML [~serialization] and Objects

• From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• To: "David Brownell" <db@E...>, "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 16:22:43 -0400

>In the general case I'd go so far as to say that _some_ elements
>represent a "thing", and many don't.  Existing DTDs aren't all done
>with a particular object modeling paradigm, and so on.  One can't
>deduce which elements represent objects, which represent properties,
>which represent actions, and so forth without a data model in hand.


Yes, we need a data model to effectively process documents 
conforming to a particular DTD. 


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: XML [~serialization] and Objects
• Next by Date: Notations
• Previous by thread: RE: XML [~serialization] and Objects
• Next by thread: Notations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread