[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: More on Namespaces

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 14:12:24 -0400

Dean Roddey writes:

 > It seems that mixing up namespaces and DTDs/Schemas is
 > incorrect. DTDs and Schemas would *use* namespaces, but a namespace
 > itself should be just a namespace, shouldn't it?  Making a
 > namespace and a DTD/Schema one and the same means that the tags in
 > that namespace could only be used in a document that matched that
 > DTD/Schema, which obviously would not be optimal for very open
 > ended sets of tags.

Absolutely correct -- the XML WG came to the same conclusion.
Although the schema mechanism is not yet defined, it will certainly be
possible to have a many-to-many relationship among schemas and
namespaces.  I can write my own structural schema that happens to use
names from the TEI and Docbook namespaces, but arranged according to
my own requirements (i.e. this is a TEI paragraph, but I'm allowing it
only here).


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: More on Namespaces
    • From: Dean Roddey <roddey@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: a small question on xml
• Next by Date: Is XML getting too hard? (was: Re: More on Namespaces...)
• Previous by thread: Re: More on Namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: More on Namespaces (long, but optimistic)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread