[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)

• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• To: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@m...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 22:24:43 +0700

Charles Reitzel wrote:

> Namespaces are an inherently global construct and I can see no reason why
> document writers cannot live with a single prefix per global identifier
> within a document.

See http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-webarch-extlang#Local for some reasons.

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)
    • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: To validate or not to validate, that is the question
• Next by Date: Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)
• Previous by thread: Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)
• Next by thread: Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread