[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSchema Spec - XSchema Element (Sections 2.0 and 2.1), Draft 6

• From: rbourret@d... (Ron Bourret)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:41:43 +0200

> Just to make sure, you are overriding the default in the Doc element to use 
the 
> IBTWSH URI and in the More element to set the default to null.  (We can't 
really 
> do anything else with More because we don't know what namespace URI or prefix 
> people will use.)  We should also recommend that people include these 
attribute 
> declarations in their internal subset when the XSchema DTD is external and 
they 
> are using a non-validating parser.

Oops.  I just realized you can't do this.  Namespace attributes apply to the element where they 
occur and all children.  Thus, the following declaration places the Doc element 
in the IBTWSH namespace, which is a validity violation of the XSchema DTD.

<Doc xmlns="IBTWSH URI">

There doesn't seem to be a way that we can say we want all elements beneath (but 
not including) the Doc element to be in the IBTWSH namespace.  Instead, the 
instance will need to either use a prefix (which we can declare in Doc) or 
change the default in all elements directly beneath Doc.  Same applies to More.

-- Ron Bourret

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces !
• Next by Date: Re: XSchema Spec - XSchema Element (Sections 2.0 and 2.1), Draft 6
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema Spec - XSchema Element (Sections 2.0 and 2.1), Draft 6
• Next by thread: Re: XSchema Spec - XSchema Element (Sections 2.0 and 2.1), Draft 6
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread