[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

REQ: ISO 8601 Comments

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:27:34 -0700

Those of us working on the XLF (Extensible Log Format) are faced with the
issue of deciding on the timestamp format.  I thought it would be prudent to
seek comments on the subject in general and specifically on use of the ISO
8601 standard from the XML-DEV members.

The choices we are considering are:

1. Single timestamp attribute using ISO 8601
2. Single timestamp attribute using custom format designed for searching,
sorting, and parsing efficiency.
3. Timestamp info broken up into multiple attributes (year, month, date,
hour, minute, second, milliseconds, nanoseconds.
4. Timestamp info broken up into two or three attributes (year/month/date,
hour/minute/second, etc.) with the possibility of using ISO 8601.

A related side issue is whether to require global time or allow local time
as well.

It is interesting to note that the recently released DCD spec uses ISO 8601
subset (whatever that means).

Don Park



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: REQ: ISO 8601 Comments
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • Re: REQ: ISO 8601 Comments
    • From: Chris Hubick <maillist@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Java class != XML entity
• Next by Date: Re: REQ: ISO 8601 Comments
• Previous by thread: Doctype dec and Namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: REQ: ISO 8601 Comments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread