|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Parameter entities - inconsistency in standard?
In responding to Peter Jones's question about undeclared entities, I noticed what appears to be an inconsistency in the standard. Section 4.4.8 says that parameter entities need only be "included if validating". Note that it doesn't limit this to external PEs. The well-formedness constraint [WFC: Entity Declared] on production 68 is consistent with this: In a document without any DTD, a document with only an internal DTD subset which contains no parameter entity references, or a document with "standalone='yes'", the Name given in the entity reference must match that in an entity declaration [...] But the corresponding validity constraint [VC: Entity Declared] says: In a document with an external subset or external parameter entities with "standalone='no'" [...] If it's really intended that non-validating processors need not expand references to internal PEs, then "external parameter entities" should be changed to "parameter entities". As it stands, it appears that it is both well-formed and valid for entities not to be declared in documents with standalone="no" that contain internal PE references but no external ones! -- Richard xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








